India's expanding health insurance coverage has reduced financial risk but has not eliminated health inequity. Critically examine with reference to recent survey data.
Examine
India's PMJAY-led insurance expansion tripled coverage between 2017-18 and 2025 — yet NSS 80th Round data reveals persistent inequity beneath this achievement.
Where Financial Risk Reduced
- Rural coverage: 12.9%→45.5%, Urban: 8.9%→31.8%
- Institutional deliveries: 95.6% rural, 97.8% urban
- Median outpatient OOP at public facilities = ₹0
Where Inequity Deepens
- OOP on hospitalisation more than doubled despite coverage expansion
- 57% PMJAY enrollees used private hospitals → average OOP: ₹31,250 rural despite free treatment promise
- Only 13% urban poorest actually using GFHI hospitalisation → elite capture confirmed
- Private hospitalisation costs: +70% rural, +80% urban
- GFHIs use public tax money subsidising unregulated private markets — "of the rich, for the profit, by the poor"
Verdict Insurance promises protection — yet OOP doubled. Coverage without strengthened public systems produces coverage without care. Ayushman Arogya Mandir — severely underfunded — must become the foundation, not the afterthought.
Total words: 152
Directive: Critically Examine — state claim; what holds (brief); dominant critical weight; contradictions; verdict
- What holds: Coverage tripled → median outpatient OOP = ₹0 → institutional deliveries 95.6%
- Where it fails: OOP doubled → 57% PMJAY in private → only 13% poorest benefiting → elite capture
- Verdict: Coverage ≠ care → public system strengthening = correct path
Write. Evaluate. Improve. Repeat.
Don’t just write—know where you stand and how to improve.
👉 Unlock EvaluationInstant AI Evaluation
Paid users get detailed feedback. Free users can evaluate today free questions.