Revamping UDAN: Five-Year Subsidy Extension for Airlines
Introduction
Air connectivity is no longer a luxury â it is an infrastructure imperative for equitable regional development. India, with the world's third-largest aviation market, still has vast Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities underserved by air travel. Launched in 2017, the UDAN (Ude Desh ka Aam Naagrik) scheme aimed to democratise aviation â yet a CAG report found only 7â10% of routes remained viable beyond the subsidy period, and 327 of 663 routes launched have since been discontinued. The Union Cabinet's approval of a âš28,840 crore revamped UDAN scheme â a nearly six-fold increase â marks a significant policy correction, shifting from infrastructure-first to a sustained operations-and-connectivity model.
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Original UDAN outlay (2017) | âš4,500 crore |
| Revised outlay (2026) | âš28,840 crore |
| Routes launched since 2017 | 663 |
| Routes discontinued | 327 (49%) |
| Airports revived under UDAN | 95 |
| Airports fallen into disuse | 15 |
| Route viability beyond subsidy (CAG) | Only 7â10% |
| Subsidy period extended | 3 years â 5 years |
Background & Context
What is UDAN? UDAN â Ude Desh ka Aam Naagrik (Let the common citizen fly) â is India's Regional Connectivity Scheme (RCS) launched in 2017 under the National Civil Aviation Policy. Its core objectives:
- Revive underserved and unserved airports
- Make air travel affordable on regional routes
- Stimulate economic activity in Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities
The Bidding Mechanism Airlines compete for routes connecting smaller cities. The winning airline receives Viability Gap Funding (VGF) â a subsidy equivalent to 50% of seating capacity. In return, airlines must sell 50% of seats at a flat rate of âš2,500 per flight hour â making regional air travel affordable.
The Subsidy Funding Shift Previously, subsidies were funded through a Regional Connectivity Scheme (RCS) levy embedded in airfares on non-UDAN routes â effectively taxing passengers on profitable routes to subsidise unprofitable ones. The revised scheme shifts this to direct exchequer funding â a more transparent and sustainable model.
Key Changes in Revamped UDAN (2026)
| Parameter | Original UDAN | Revamped UDAN 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Total outlay | âš4,500 crore | âš28,840 crore |
| Subsidy period | 3 years | 5 years |
| Subsidy source | RCS levy on airfares | Direct exchequer funding |
| Airport focus | Revive unused airports | Redevelopment + O&M support |
| Airports targeted | 95 revived | 100 new redevelopments |
| Helipads proposed | â | 200 helipads (âš15 cr each) |
| Scope | Infrastructure only | Infrastructure + Operations + Maintenance |
Fund Allocation Breakdown
| Component | Outlay |
|---|---|
| Airline route subsidies (10 years) | âš10,043 crore |
| Airport redevelopment (100 airports, 8 years) | âš12,159 crore |
| Airport operations & maintenance (441 aerodromes) | âš2,577 crore |
| Helipad development (200 helipads) | âš3,661 crore |
| Aircraft procurement (HAL Dhruv, Dornier) | Remaining allocation |
Why the Original UDAN Underperformed
1. Route Viability Problem Only 7â10% of routes remained commercially viable after the subsidy window ended. Airlines exited routes the moment subsidies lapsed â revealing that demand on many routes was insufficient to sustain commercial operations independently.
2. Scale of Discontinuation
- 327 of 663 routes (49%) discontinued
- 15 of 95 airports revived fell back into disuse
- This represents significant sunk infrastructure costs with limited sustained economic benefit
3. Structural Design Flaws
- Three-year subsidy window was too short for route maturation and demand development
- RCS levy funding was opaque and regressive â burdening passengers on profitable routes
- No sustained support for airport operations and maintenance post-revival
- Insufficient last-mile connectivity to airports in remote areas
4. Demand-Side Gaps Regional air travel demand is constrained by:
- Low per-capita income in Tier-2/3 cities
- Poor surface connectivity to airports
- Lack of awareness and digital ticketing penetration
Policy Significance of Key Changes
1. Extended Subsidy Period (3 â 5 years) Gives routes longer runway for demand to mature organically before commercial viability is tested â addressing the primary cause of mass route discontinuation.
2. Exchequer Funding over RCS Levy
- More transparent fiscal accounting
- Removes regressive cross-subsidisation from air passengers
- Subjects UDAN spending to parliamentary scrutiny â improving accountability
3. Operations & Maintenance Support Capped at âš3.06 crore per airport â addresses the post-revival collapse of low-traffic airports by funding ongoing operational costs, not just one-time infrastructure.
4. Helipad Development (200 helipads) Critical for last-mile connectivity in:
- North-East India
- Himalayan states (Uttarakhand, Himachal, J&K)
- Island territories (Andaman, Lakshadweep)
- Remote tribal areas
5. HAL Aircraft Procurement Procuring HAL Dhruv helicopters for Pawan Hans and HAL Dornier aircraft for Alliance Air supports domestic aerospace manufacturing â aligning UDAN with Aatmanirbhar Bharat and the defence-civil aviation convergence agenda.
Broader Implications
Economic Development
- Regional airports stimulate local tourism, trade, and investment
- Reduced travel time connects producers in smaller cities to larger markets
- Supports India's target of 220 operational airports by 2025 under the National Civil Aviation Policy
Equity & Inclusion
- Democratises air travel beyond metro cities
- Enables faster medical evacuation and disaster response in remote areas
- Connects tribal and border areas â with security and development co-benefits
Federal Dimension States share the financial burden of UDAN â state governments contribute to VGF and provide land, waived taxes, and reduced VAT on aviation turbine fuel. The Karnataka Minister's concern about Tier-2 airport viability post-UDAN reflects the federal fiscal stress when central subsidies lapse.
Challenges Ahead
- Demand sustainability: Extended subsidies delay but do not resolve the fundamental demand viability question on thin routes
- Airline capacity: Indian carriers face aircraft shortage and high operating costs â limiting willingness to operate marginal routes
- Airport O&M: âš3.06 crore cap per airport may be insufficient for larger regional airports with higher maintenance costs
- Last-mile connectivity: Without surface transport to airports, air connectivity remains inaccessible to target populations
- Fiscal burden: âš28,840 crore over 10 years is significant â requires robust monitoring to prevent fund diversion or underutilisation
Way Forward
- Demand-side interventions: Promote regional tourism packages, corporate travel incentives, and digital ticketing awareness
- Surface connectivity: Integrate UDAN airports with highway and rail networks under PM Gati Shakti
- Route rationalisation: CAG-informed analysis to identify genuinely viable routes versus permanently unviable ones â avoid subsidising the latter indefinitely
- State partnership: Stronger state-level accountability for airport upkeep and local demand generation
- Private sector: Encourage PPP models for airport O&M at commercially marginal airports
- Monitoring framework: Real-time route performance dashboard â discontinue non-performing routes early and redeploy subsidies
Conclusion
The revamped UDAN scheme represents an honest policy reckoning â acknowledging that infrastructure alone cannot sustain regional aviation without continuous operational support and longer demand incubation periods. The six-fold funding increase and shift to exchequer-based subsidies reflect fiscal seriousness, but the deeper challenge remains: creating genuine, self-sustaining air travel demand in India's smaller cities. UDAN's true measure of success is not the number of routes launched or airports revived â it is the percentage that remain operational five years after subsidies end. Until that metric improves dramatically from the current 7â10%, UDAN will remain a connectivity aspiration rather than a connectivity achievement.
Attribution
Original content sources and authors
Syllabus classification
How this article maps to GS papers
Main syllabus
GS3InfrastructureQuick Q&A
What is the UDAN (Ude Desh ka Aam Nagrik) scheme, and what are the key features of its revamped version in 2026?
Key features of the revamped UDAN scheme (2026):
- Increased outlay: Expanded to âš28,840 crore, nearly six times the original allocation
- Extended subsidy period: Increased from 3 years to 5 years for selected routes
- Shift in funding: Subsidies now funded directly from the exchequer instead of airfare levies
- Infrastructure push: Development of 100 airports, 200 helipads, and support for aerodromes
- Operational support: Financial aid for maintenance and operations of low-traffic airports
The scheme continues its bidding mechanism, where airlines compete for routes and receive viability gap funding (VGF) while offering affordable fares capped at âš2,500 per hour.
Significance: The revamped scheme reflects a shift from mere infrastructure creation to ensuring sustainability and operational viability. It aims to address earlier shortcomings by supporting airlines and airports over a longer duration, thereby strengthening India's regional aviation ecosystem.
Why was there a need to revamp the UDAN scheme despite its initial success?
Key reasons for revamp:
- Low route viability: Only 7%â10% of routes remained operational after subsidy withdrawal, as per CAG findings
- High discontinuation rate: 327 out of 663 routes were discontinued by 2026
- Underutilised infrastructure: 15 out of 95 revived airports fell into disuse
- Short subsidy duration: The 3-year cap was insufficient for routes to become self-sustaining
For example, many routes connecting remote regions faced low passenger demand, making them commercially unviable without continued support.
Policy implications: The earlier model relied heavily on market forces after initial support, which proved unrealistic in low-demand regions. The shift to longer subsidies and direct funding indicates recognition of the need for state intervention in public infrastructure sectors.
Conclusion: The revamp is a corrective measure aimed at addressing structural weaknesses, ensuring sustained connectivity, and preventing wastage of public investment in infrastructure.
How does the viability gap funding (VGF) mechanism under UDAN work to promote regional air connectivity?
Working mechanism:
- Airlines bid for specific regional routes under a competitive process
- The government provides subsidies (VGF) to selected airlines to cover operational losses
- In return, airlines must cap fares at âš2,500 per hour of flight for 50% of seats
- The remaining seats can be sold at market rates
Initially, VGF was funded through a Regional Connectivity Scheme (RCS) levy on passengers flying non-UDAN routes. The revamped scheme shifts this burden to direct government funding.
Example: A flight connecting a remote town to a metro city may not attract enough passengers to be profitable. VGF compensates airlines for this gap, ensuring continued operations.
Impact: The mechanism has enabled connectivity to remote and underserved areas, fostering regional development. However, its effectiveness depends on demand generation and cost management.
Conclusion: VGF is a crucial policy tool that balances affordability and commercial viability, though it requires continuous monitoring to avoid inefficiencies and fiscal strain.
What are the reasons behind the low sustainability of UDAN routes, and what challenges do regional aviation markets face in India?
Key reasons:
- Low passenger demand: Smaller cities often lack sufficient traffic
- High operational costs: Fuel, maintenance, and logistics costs remain high
- Limited infrastructure: Many airports lack modern facilities
- Short subsidy duration: Airlines could not stabilize operations within 3 years
For instance, routes connecting remote or economically weaker regions may not generate enough revenue even with subsidised fares.
Broader challenges:
- Seasonal demand fluctuations
- Poor last-mile connectivity to airports
- Competition from rail and road transport
Implications: These challenges highlight the difficulty of applying a purely market-driven model to public infrastructure. Regional aviation often requires sustained policy support.
Conclusion: Addressing these issues requires a holistic approach, including infrastructure development, demand stimulation, and integrated transport planning, beyond just financial subsidies.
Provide an example of how the revamped UDAN scheme can improve last-mile connectivity in remote and difficult terrains.
Key initiatives:
- Development of 200 helipads at a cost of âš3,661 crore
- Support for heliports and water aerodromes
- Procurement of helicopters like HAL Dhruv for regional operations
For example, in hilly regions like Arunachal Pradesh, where road connectivity is limited, helicopters can provide quick and reliable transport for passengers, medical emergencies, and essential goods.
Case study: In the Northeast, UDAN flights and helicopter services have already reduced travel time significantly, improving access to healthcare, education, and markets.
Impact: Enhanced connectivity can boost tourism, trade, and local economies while integrating remote regions with the national mainstream.
Conclusion: By focusing on multimodal connectivity, the revamped scheme addresses geographical barriers and ensures inclusive development, making air travel a viable option even in inaccessible areas.
Critically analyse the shift from airfare-based levy funding to direct government funding in the UDAN scheme.
Advantages of direct funding:
- Transparency: Clear allocation from the budget improves accountability
- Reduced burden on passengers: Lowers ticket prices on non-UDAN routes
- Stability: Ensures consistent funding irrespective of passenger traffic
Limitations:
- Fiscal burden: Increased pressure on government finances
- Risk of inefficiency: Subsidy dependence may discourage cost optimization
- Opportunity cost: Funds could be used for other sectors
For example, the âš10,043 crore allocated for subsidies reflects a significant commitment of public resources.
Evaluation: While direct funding improves equity and predictability, it requires strong monitoring mechanisms to ensure effective utilization.
Conclusion: The shift is a pragmatic step to sustain the scheme, but long-term success depends on balancing fiscal responsibility with developmental objectives.
Evaluate the UDAN scheme as a case study of public policy intervention in infrastructure development.
Achievements:
- Expansion of regional connectivity to underserved areas
- Revival of unused airports
- Increased accessibility of air travel for common citizens
However, the scheme also faced significant challenges, such as low route viability and infrastructure underutilization.
Policy lessons:
- Need for long-term support: Infrastructure projects require sustained funding
- Importance of demand assessment: Projects must align with market realities
- Integrated planning: Coordination with other transport modes is essential
Example: The discontinuation of nearly half the routes highlights gaps in initial planning and execution.
Conclusion: UDAN demonstrates that while public policy can bridge market gaps, its success depends on adaptive design, continuous evaluation, and alignment with broader economic and social goals.
Practice questions
1 question for mains preparation