Evaluate the arguments for and against decentralisation of NEET in the context of administrative efficacy and student welfare. What modifications can be made to NEET to address cur

GS2 Education
Evaluate the arguments for and against decentralisation of NEET in the context of administrative efficacy and student welfare. What modifications can be made to NEET to address current challenges?

Evaluate

  • 10 marks
  • 8 min
  • 150 words
  • Medium

The Hindu

Read article →

Introduction

The National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) was introduced to establish a uniform and transparent system for medical admissions in India. However, recurring concerns regarding inequity, language barriers, coaching dependence, and examination irregularities have revived debates on decentralisation. The issue involves balancing administrative efficiency with student welfare and social justice.

Arguments for Decentralisation of NEET

Promotes Social Equity

  • State-specific admission systems can better account for:

    • Regional educational disparities,
    • Rural–urban divides,
    • Socio-economic inequalities.

  • Tamil Nadu has argued that NEET disadvantages government-school and State Board students.

Respects Federalism

  • Education is a subject in the Concurrent List.
  • States seek greater autonomy in designing admission criteria aligned with local needs.

Reduces Coaching Dependency

  • State-level systems based on Class XII performance may reduce excessive reliance on expensive coaching institutions.

Student Welfare

  • Multiple opportunities or state-level flexibility may reduce psychological stress associated with a single high-stakes examination.

Arguments Against Decentralisation

Ensures Uniform Standards

  • NEET creates a common benchmark for medical admissions across India.
  • The Supreme Court in Christian Medical College v. Union of India (2020) upheld NEET for maintaining merit and transparency.

Administrative Efficiency

  • A single examination reduces duplication, logistical burdens, and costs for students.
  • Prevents opaque admission processes and capitation fee practices.

National Mobility

  • Students can compete across states, promoting equal opportunity and integration.

Reduces Corruption

  • Centralized counselling and testing improve transparency compared to fragmented systems.

Current Challenges in NEET

  • Paper leak allegations and examination irregularities.
  • Curriculum mismatch between CBSE and State Boards.
  • Language translation errors.
  • Digital and economic inequalities.
  • Extreme psychological pressure on aspirants.

Suggested Modifications

Academic Reforms

  • Align NEET syllabus with all major State Boards.
  • Introduce competency-based rather than rote-learning questions.

Equity Measures

  • Expand free coaching and bridge courses for rural and government-school students.
  • Increase weightage for school performance or normalize scores regionally.

Examination Reforms

  • Conduct NEET in multiple sessions like JEE with score normalization.
  • Strengthen cybersecurity and independent oversight to prevent leaks.

Student Welfare Measures

  • Provide mental health support and flexible attempt systems.
  • Improve multilingual quality and accessibility.

Conclusion

Complete decentralisation may undermine uniform standards, while excessive centralisation risks deepening inequalities. Therefore, the need is not abolition of NEET but its reform through a balanced model that combines transparency and merit with equity, federal sensitivity, and student welfare.