“An eye for an eye will make the whole world blind.” — Mahatma Gandhi. In the light of the above statement, critically examine the challenges in addressing terrorism through a unified global approach, particularly in the context of violence, peace, and international cooperation.
15 marks
8 mins
250 words
Apr 29, 2026
Directive: CRITICALLY EXAMINE — Intro (state the claim as given) → What works / holds true (brief) → Where it fails / falls short (dominant) → Contradictions, gaps, or missing dimensions → Verdict conclusion
- Intro (claim): Gandhi → retaliation escalates violence; need unified, peace-based global response to terrorism
- What works (brief): multilateral efforts (UN norms, SCO cooperation, RATS) → coordination, intelligence sharing
- Where it falls short (dominant): double standards, state-sponsored terrorism, lack of common definition, geopolitical rivalries
- Contradictions/gaps: peace vs counter-terror force; sovereignty vs collective action; selective condemnation undermines credibility
- Verdict: global consensus exists in principle, but fragmented in practice → needs consistent norms, zero tolerance, trust-based cooperation