GS3 → Internal Security
Medium
India's internal security challenges can no longer be addressed through a uniform doctrine — terrain, technology, and the changing profile of insurgency demand a continuously evolving counter-strategy. Examine this statement with reference to the transformation of counter-terrorism operations in Jammu & Kashmir post-2021
15 marks
8 mins
250 words
Apr 22, 2026
Directive Word: EXAMINE → Break into components, analyse each, qualify where needed, structured conclusion.
- Intro → Pahalgam 2025 + Chenab Valley ambushes = old doctrine ≠ sufficient + terrain + profile both changed ↑
- Component 1 → Terrain shift → urban → forests + high altitude = 150 SF killed ≠ conventional CT model adequate
- Component 2 → Profile shift → local recruits ↓ (5 only) + foreign terrorists ↑ (65) = insurgency → proxy war ≠ same response
- Component 3 → Doctrine response → Greyhounds training + TOBs + drone ISR = evolving ✓ ≠ fully transformed yet
- Holds → Op Mahadev ✓ + SOG re-energisation ✓ + technology induction ✓ = positive trajectory
- Qualify → 60-day scan + multiple escapes = gaps remain ≠ real-time ISR fully integrated yet
- Conclusion → Terrain-specific doctrine + technology + diplomatic pressure on Pakistan = complete response ↑ ≠ military fix alone